<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make a link open in a new window while keeping your code valid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brunoabrantes.com/blog/make-a-link-open-in-a-new-window-while-keeping-your-code-valid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brunoabrantes.com/blog/make-a-link-open-in-a-new-window-while-keeping-your-code-valid/</link>
	<description>A blog about Web Design and Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:22:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angellaa</title>
		<link>http://www.brunoabrantes.com/blog/make-a-link-open-in-a-new-window-while-keeping-your-code-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Angellaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunoabrantes.com/?p=457#comment-425</guid>
		<description>Hmm, very cognitive post. 
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, very cognitive post.<br />
Is this theme good unough for the Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Abrantes</title>
		<link>http://www.brunoabrantes.com/blog/make-a-link-open-in-a-new-window-while-keeping-your-code-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Abrantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunoabrantes.com/?p=457#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I must say your comment inspired me to think real hard about why we should use or not use Strict DTDs. I think the answer boils down to the fact that Strict actually &lt;em&gt;enforces&lt;/em&gt; separation between content and presentation, which is clearly the path to follow if you want  your sites not to break in the future. Also, at least &lt;em&gt;theoretically&lt;/em&gt;, using Strict instead of Transitional causes browsers to render the page in the most standards-compliant way possible, which may or may not affect how your page is presented to the end user. Check &lt;a href=&quot;http://24ways.org/2005/transitional-vs-strict-markup&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article at 24 ways&lt;/a&gt; for some more info on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say your comment inspired me to think real hard about why we should use or not use Strict DTDs. I think the answer boils down to the fact that Strict actually <em>enforces</em> separation between content and presentation, which is clearly the path to follow if you want  your sites not to break in the future. Also, at least <em>theoretically</em>, using Strict instead of Transitional causes browsers to render the page in the most standards-compliant way possible, which may or may not affect how your page is presented to the end user. Check <a href="http://24ways.org/2005/transitional-vs-strict-markup" rel="nofollow">this article at 24 ways</a> for some more info on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean McArthur</title>
		<link>http://www.brunoabrantes.com/blog/make-a-link-open-in-a-new-window-while-keeping-your-code-valid/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean McArthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brunoabrantes.com/?p=457#comment-413</guid>
		<description>I make every page Transitional, so I don&#039;t need to worry about.  Considering that browsers are behind web technologies, Transitional doctypes will be useful for a while to come, so I see no need to change to Strict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make every page Transitional, so I don&#8217;t need to worry about.  Considering that browsers are behind web technologies, Transitional doctypes will be useful for a while to come, so I see no need to change to Strict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
